To all authors of Chapters: the function in the psychoanalytic field is not to interfer in others life. Less in other psychoanalysts life : keep your beta view for you and don’t use skills to take away documents .
Chapter V
Lawrence J. Brown contributes in Annie Reiner’s “Of Things invisible to Mortal Sight” Karnac Books with Chapter Five. 5
He begins with a quote of James Grotstein : “All psychopathology is the result of a failure of dreaming “ this quote acquires a special meaning and has to be thought about for benefits in the so called psychoanalytic field ( concept used by Ferro, in his contribution “Clinical example 19 page 234 “But at the same time and in another level “ Karnac Books , particularly in “Marcella’s apartment below “( 9) published in Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 72 (2003) 183-200 “Marcella’s the transition from explosive sensoriality to the ability to think “ which describes the underlining idea applied in the psychoanalytic field and consequences for the practicing psychoanalyst in Venezuela and her family. (Agua yo as destruction)
Also called distance to the observed And distortions. (Reiner Page 239) and Aguayo’s analytic climate @heretical (Aguayo 2013) catastrophic change with “wild interpretations (page 11 Of things) made too early and forcefully in analysis ; the analysis of “deep “ unconscious content before a more gradual and careful analysis of defenses “ (page 11 Of things ) or in the reviewers experience : defense systems that should not -as technical advice - be attacked . Defenses have reasons to exist . Defenses are difficult to preserve under the effects of transformations in hallucinations in groups as observed in the psychoanalytic field . “Not all can be gratified “
was at time P. Sandler’s comment .
Consequences for one family group ? ( illness ,disintegration attack’s ) Wasn’t it enough containment in @Post? Not really a play ground or play mountain. Steve.
Or as to Quote Antonini Ferro „A Beam of intense Darkness by James Grotstein Chapter 4 Page 59 of Reiner’s “Of things invisible to Mortal sights on Second opinion ( page 59) ....” giving ill -informed orders because of their distance from the scene in action “ and human tendencies to carry out “transformations in hallucinosis (Bion 1965) to impose meaning on what has no meaning because of our incapacity to wait for shred of meaning to emerge . Or to seek a second opinion ( supervision) Like snails which produce slime ,we are species that continuously “slimes“ meaning because we cannot bear the darkness of our not/knowing .” See > Page 57 Chapter VI Ferro
This “slime” is then used to construct the Tower of Babel by not publishing or mentioned in references the described in the reviewers unpublished papers proposed to IJP Journal in many moments on “ talking as dreaming “ observed in infants talk in clinical work of the reviewer in Venezuela 2000-2008. ( not delivered until now 2018 but self attributed by those Caracas 2018 @Post and @SaoPaulo.
A topic also approached by Frau Doktor Mistriani PCC psychoanalytic society Los Angeles who initiated her diamond seminars on autism in Berlin ‘s IPA Congress 2007 and contributed with her experience in the psychoanalytic field in the city of Bad Homburg , Germany with proposals for the practicing psychoanalyst not delivered until the moment 2018. Specially with delicate themes as family des- integration and worldview under the darkness ( dark point)and limitations on worldview and those already mentioned above by A. Ferro.
Not to forget Ronald Britton’s contribution on Washington Post @Post Steven Spielberg with “existential disappearances “ “unexpected disappearances “ “someone disappears “ targets“ grunts “that’s free fall “ (page 230) Clinical example 18 Chapter 25 “...But at the same time and in another level ...” by James Grotstein , Karnac Books quoting Ronald Britton’s unpublished paper “The Baby and the Bathwater “.also called facilitating astra flights . ( more than British )
Larry Brown refers in page 93 , Chapter five of Things invisible ..... to a "Skype "experience -" I Skyped with Jim , he said he wanted to introduce me to his new friend , Johnnie Walker ..."a conversation between him and Dr. James Grotstein ; with Johnny Walker, a walker Grotstein had to use then ; Brown related as how sad was the experience to cope with the loss of of function " Page 93 Of things....
Dr. W.R. Bion in his War Memoirs makes a reference to "Buchanan , his runner who walked with him and helped him along in war , real Second World War - not imaginary war - Buchanan ( who is who was and to whom this was projected) Buchanan who concealed in difficult times of war . (Page 150 War Memoirs ) We were to do an attack at the flank if the salient simply to prevent the enemy from retiring peaceful ."
I think Grotstein in some sense was telling to Dr. Brown : " I was not in war ! Were you? Dr. Brown?"Long before the moon - not he sun- came up..... Bion’s War memorable 1918-19. Harry Karnac Books.
So this is a matter to think about Dr. Brown , I don't know if you were in the Bion congress in Rome I will check your presentation . I -the reviewer- consider I am empowered to do so ; I speak more than one psychoanalytic languages , you would remember the intervention of Dr. Dario Sor at the Bion Congress in Rom, who complaint about G’s supposed or not attacks on Elizabeth Tabak de Bianchedi and her husband in pietat. ( see mutuality in Bianchedi’s “ The various faces of lies” “ What is truth ? Said jesting Pilate ( page 220 W.R. Bion Between Past and Future by Parthenope Bion: quote Bianchedi Page 224: “For Grotstein (1981) the difference between falsities and lies is the latter‘s use of psychotic mechanism which includes disavowal ...” ( very actual (2018) this kind of interchanges between analysts under the pressure of the unknown and disappearances of one - we are the one to grow!- and desintegracións )
Celia Fix Korbivcher did not listen Sor’s complaints in Rom , she had been retained and arrived late this day to the Bion congress 2008. I suppose she should not listen whom G Had NOT ATTACKED. Dario Sor was a close collaborator of G from Argentine , where were ears to listen @?
Rome, 2009 what attacked , what happened 2008 in Homburg? What was the group' s vision and state of mind? Who pays?
You sent me ( the reviewer ) a email at the occasion of the Bion Congress on Boston , as well as letter signed by Natalie Lieshear (very actual organizers in IJP Journal event in New York Oct 2018 ) announcing my paper had not been accepted but you invited me in the mail telling : I would have to pay for all"! Without specifying what meant " to pay for all"!
In Chapter Five I read "Dr, Joseph Agua yo and I organized a meeting of remembrance for Jim"
You invited also Lima 2006 who has a very particular vision....of her depredator mind and consequent sanity as a curtain .. You invited Señora Berlin to Boston 2009 as a contribution to symbols and distances that distortions world views in the psychoanalytic field ( this is the way to address in the field to analysts : "señora" hence no woman psychoanalyst has PHD in Venezuela , woman are called doctoras ) . Berlin alludes to the patient in Chapter Nine : Leonard who run away from an organised romantic meeting. ( No fully organized meeting is romantic )? was d Berlin a passing bill to British who do not publish in " Of things invisible ....?" For Berlin 2007? Those Who never run away?
More interesting was what happened and what wild thoughts ( not from Rafael encyclopedia ) appeared -visibly when I wrote about Buchanan the runner in my review and Johnny Walker....sky ping experience in this blogg the first time : something happened as wild thought can’t be referred to at Sao Paulo ‘ wild thoughts congress hence the plunder effects and depilating made “me literally financially break down “( Grotstein describing his financial and editorial difficulties to publish:” Do I dare disturb the universe?” Retained from swimming (LMC) and rugby ( Ron Santa Teresa Caracas is already playing rugby) ( see Bion’s distinguished contribution while Queens College page 3 do I dare disturb) ....waiting for consciousness to come or perhaps said in Bion’s words :” what kind of psychoanalysis is required for consciousness ?”
I Reserve publication please abstain cutting off lines or changing them if you quote please don’t forget the reference this is a scientific requirement of the IJP Journal whose 100 years we are celebrating today . See event in New York
20.3.2018